Format of a proposal

Different Types of PhD Proposals

Different Types of PhD Proposals

A PhD proposal is a document that is provided to the potential funding source explaining the whole program. It includes goals, objectives, techniques, timetables, experts pledged, and program budget. It’s common to interchange the words “proposal” and “application.” Although it is only one component of the complete proposal, the sponsor may in some circumstances demand an application form.

Types of PhD Proposal

Here are some types of PhD proposals.

Solicited PhD proposal:

When the client requests a proposal, it is known as a solicited proposal. They can seek proposals either verbally or in writing (RFP). Clients who issue an RFP often get solicited offers. A consumer will frequently write out a description of their request and submit it as an RFP. This is done when their request is too sophisticated to pick up in person or purchase from a provider. They might send out a Request for Quotations if it’s a commodity (RFQ). An RFQ often just needs a price and a small amount of information.

A thorough explanation of your strategy or offer, together with its cost, is requested in an RFP. You can learn more about the client’s requirements through a proposal. Most also give you guidelines on how to construct your proposal and the applied standards in making a decision.

When you advise anything to a prospective client, they may want a PhD proposal from you before they take you up on your offer. This qualifies as a solicited proposal since the client is anticipating it. Moreover, you can speak with them and learn about their requirements.

Unsolicited PhD proposal:

When you give someone a proposal that they had not even requested, it is known as an unsolicited proposal.

The consumer gets an unsolicited PhD proposal unwillingly. Unsolicited proposals need more persuasiveness because the client hasn’t scheduled, financed, or considered the PhD proposal. You face the risk that the consumer does not read the proposal, if it is an unsolicited one, as they didn’t request it. Yet, the risk is frequently offset by the absence of market pressure with an unsolicited bid.

In reality, it is a brochure rather than a proposal if you submit the same unsolicited proposal to several clients. The environment, requirements, and issues unique to the client are considered while writing a PhD proposal. Due to the greater alignment of service with  the consumer’s priorities, proposals carry a greater win percentage than brochures.

These are offered on the initiative of the proposer. They want to catch the interest of potential customers and purchasers. They are broad and have nothing to do with a particular client’s requirements. Making the consumer aware of an issue is the first step in making an unsolicited business proposal.

Since the consumer is not expecting the proposal, it must have a persuasive tone. In most cases, they are employed to promote fresh goods and services. After the first move to get in touch with the agency staff you’re interested in, you may possibly land the contract.

Renewal and Continuation PhD Proposals

A competing renewal proposal is also known as a competing continuation. It is an application for further money for a project whose funding or project duration is about to expire. These PhD proposals are acceptable in the same way as “new” proposals because they are comparable.

Non-competing continuation PhD proposals that ask for the next year’s funding as part of a multi-year grant. It often includes a progress report, a budget, and other materials like research findings, reprints, curriculum vitae for new hires, etc. The unobligated balance for the current year is shown on a financial status report. The institutional official and the investigators’ signatures are often required. Even when funding is not needed, non-competing continuation PhD proposals are sent through Sponsored Programs Administration.

Research Performance Progress Reports

Federal entities that grant sponsored money are required to adopt the consistent progress report format known as Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPR). For non-competing continuations, it is also employed. For the Streamlined Non-Competing Award Process (SNAP), fellowships, and multi-year supported grants, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandates the usage of the RPPR module. The RPPR for non-SNAP status reports are currently accessible to all organizations, such as those for complicated and training grants.

Limited Solicitations

Sponsors will occasionally post program financing opportunities with a cap on the number of bids each institution may submit. The UNH Research Development center keeps a list of all restricted submission programs online at Current LSP Deadlines and sends out a monthly email. It is sent to the Research Office’s “Principal Investigators & Project Directors” list informing them of new possibilities. A faculty follows the pre-proposal restricted submission procedure who are interested in submitting PhD proposals.

A likelihood of outperforming other pre-proposals requires considerations. These include the sponsor’s competitive process, and the project’s strategic benefit to UNH  for which pre-proposals are sent. After they chose the pre-proposals as the institutional submission, applicants must subsequently complete an application and submit it to the sponsor. To learn more, see limited submission programs.


When a sponsor wants to reduce an applicant’s time, they ask for this kind of PhD proposal. They often take the form of a letter of intent or a succinct summary of what the principal investigator (PI) intends to achieve. Moreover, it shows how the PI will carry out the project, and why the study is worthwhile. A pre-proposal lays the groundwork for discussion; the principal investigator (PI) or the university is not bound in any way.

However, as these suggestions frequently serve as the starting point for funding negotiations, if the submission involves a budget. Then, it is sent for the relevant university signatures. The pre-proposal is used, at the sponsor’s desire, to assess how well the project meets the agency’s goals.

Sponsors also decide who advances forward. It includes who will move to the next implementation stage, aid in the choice of potential reviewers, and perhaps even provide the principal investigator (PI) an opportunity to get comments. The sponsor tells the investigator following consideration of the pre-proposal if a complete proposal is required. Pre-proposals or preliminary proposals are called “White Papers” in Broad Agency Announcements (BAA).

Revised Budgets

When a sponsor wants to fund a planned PhD Thesis proposal different from what was first offered, the sponsor puts a request. It states that the investigator present a “revised” budget to justify the quantity for support. If the budget is cut, the investigator must assess whether the feasibility analysis and goals are still achievable within the constraints of the new budget. Otherwise, before the University accepts the money, the researcher and sponsor should formally modify the project’s goals and scope.

If the initial budget carried the expense share or matching, the cost share or matching amount needs adjustment. This shall indicate the budget adjustments. Before resubmitting, institutional consent is required for these modifications.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *